To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Automated vs. conventional ultrasound-guided intra-articular CS injection for hip pain

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
November 2016

Automated vs. conventional ultrasound-guided intra-articular CS injection for hip pain

Vol: 5| Issue: 11| Number:19| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Comparison of Two Injection Techniques for Intra-articular Hip Injections.

J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Jun;35(6):1259-67.

Contributing Authors:
BD Giordano

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

40 patients with hip pain were randomized to receive an ultrasound-guided intra-articular corticosteroid injection with or without the use of an automated delivery system. The objective of this trial was to determine if the automated delivery was associated with significantly superior clinical efficiency when compared to a traditional injection technique. Outcome measures were evaluated over a 12-...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.

Continue