
Greater 24-hr analgesic efficacy of intermittent vs. continuous ACB in ACL reconstruction

Greater 24-hr analgesic efficacy of intermittent vs. continuous ACB in ACL reconstruction
Post-operative analgesia using intermittent vs. continuous adductor canal block technique: a randomized controlled trial
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 Nov;60(10):1379-1385Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
50 patients scheduled for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were randomized to postoperative analgesia with either an intermittent or continuous adductor canal block for 24 hours after surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine if intermittent boluses of 15mL ropivacaine over 24 hours was more effective for reducing pain than continuous infusion of ropivacaine at 2.5mL/hr over 24 ...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.