To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Posterior cruciate-substituting vs. retaining TKR in patients with high varus deformity

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
December 2016

Posterior cruciate-substituting vs. retaining TKR in patients with high varus deformity

Vol: 5| Issue: 12| Number:16| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:2

Posterior cruciate-substituting total knee replacement recovers the flexion arc faster in the early postoperative period in knees with high varus deformity: a prospective randomized study

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Jul;136(7):999-1006.

Contributing Authors:
A Öztürk Y Akalın N Çevik A Otuzbir Y Özkan Y Dostabakan

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

56 patients with knee osteoarthritis and varus deformity (>10 degrees) were randomized to undergo total knee replacement with either a posterior cruciate-substituting (PS) or cruciate-retaining (CR) prosthesis. The purpose of this study was to the determine the effect of these different devices on postoperative range of motion and knee function when compared over a 7-year follow-up period in patie...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue