To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Godelieve Denys-Struyf (GDS) compared to standard physical therapy for LBP

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
November 2015

Godelieve Denys-Struyf (GDS) compared to standard physical therapy for LBP

Vol: 4| Issue: 11| Number:6| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Effectiveness of the Godelieve Denys-Struyf (GDS) method in people with low back pain: cluster randomized controlled trial.

Phys Ther. 2015 Mar;95(3):319-36.

Contributing Authors:
MJ Díaz-Arribas FM Kovacs A Royuela M Fernández-Serrano L Gutiérrez-Fernández O San Martín-Pariente V Abraira M Ramos-Sánchez R Llorca-Palomera P Pardo-Hervás M Gestoso GC Sánchez-Gil MÁ Elena-Lucas R Paniagua-de-la-Calle I Castellanos-López

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

461 patients (342 patients completed follow-up) with low back pain (LBP) received a short education program, and were randomized to receive either Godelieve Denys-Struyf (GDS) sessions, or the standard physical therapy sessions typically offered in the Spanish National Health Service (SNHS). Patients in the GDS group were either administered individual sessions and group sessions (GDS-I), or only ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.