LOGIN
Mini-invasive reduction & percutaneous fixation vs ORIF for displaced calcaneal fractures
March 2015
Mini-invasive reduction & percutaneous fixation vs ORIF for displaced calcaneal fractures
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Prospective randomized trial comparing open reduction and internal fixation with minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous fixation in managing displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures
Int Orthop. 2014 Dec;38(12):2505-12Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
45 displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures were randomized to surgery through one of two methods: minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous fixation (MIRPF), or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of wound healing problems, functional outcome, and radiological outcome between the two procedures. Follow-up was performed over 1 yea...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.