To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block vs. Local Infiltration Analgesia for Pain After THA

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
September 2023

Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block vs. Local Infiltration Analgesia for Pain After THA

Vol: 303| Issue: 9| Number:18| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Comparison between Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block and Local Infiltration Analgesia for Postoperative Analgesia after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Orthop Surg. 2023 Jul;15(7):1839-1846.

Contributing Authors:
S Ye L Wang Q Wang Q Li M Alqwbani P Kang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

80 patients undergoing a total hip arthroplasty were randomized to receive a pericapsular nerve group block (PENG; n=40) or local infiltration analgesia (LIA; n=40). The primary outcome of interest was pain scores at rest and during exercise on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), measured during the first 48 hours post-operation, and post-operative morphine consumption. Secondary outcomes of interest inc...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue