To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Cervical Arthroplasty vs Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Fusion: SR of RCTs With >7 Year Follow-up

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
October 2023

Cervical Arthroplasty vs Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Fusion: SR of RCTs With >7 Year Follow-up

Vol: 305| Issue: 1| Number:2| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Outcomes of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with a minimum follow-up of 7-year.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Jul;33(5):1875-1884.

Contributing Authors:
JH Nunez B Escudero I Omiste J Martinez-Penas M Surroca F Alonzo-Gonzalez D Bosch-Garcia

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including a total of 2,664 patients were included in this systematic review comparing cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) (n=1,464) vs. anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) (n=1,200). All included RCTs had a minimum of 7 years of follow-up. The outcomes of interest included overall success rate, functional and pain scores, range of motion, adjacent ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue