To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Reduces Instability in First Time Dislocators Aged 18-25

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
July 2021

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Reduces Instability in First Time Dislocators Aged 18-25

Vol: 59| Issue: 1| Number:1| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Immobilization for First Episode of Anterior Shoulder Dislocation Before the Age of 25: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Am J Sports Med. 2021 Apr;49(5): 1166-1174.

Contributing Authors:
C Pougès A Hardy T Vervoort T Amouyel P Duriez C Lalanne C Szymanski V Deken C Chantelot P Upex C Maynou

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Forty patients aged age 18 to 25 years old with a first episode of anterior shoulder dislocation were randomized to receive arthroscopic Bankart repair (n=20) or nonoperative management (n=20). The primary outcome of interest was recurrence of instability at two year follow-up. Secondary outcomes of interest included range of motion, return to sport, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DA...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue