To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Posterior Cruciate- Retaining versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: an RCT

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2024

Posterior Cruciate- Retaining versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: an RCT

Vol: 306| Issue: 3| Number:19| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

12-Year clinical and radiological results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Knee . 2023 Dec:45:110-116.

Contributing Authors:
RFMR Kersten AJ de Vries JJAM van Raaij RW Brouwer

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

One hundred fourteen patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomized to receive either a posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR; n=61) or posterior-stabilizing (PS; n=53) implant design in a 12-year double-blind randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome of interest was prosthesis survival, and secondary outcomes included clinical measures such as Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteo...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue