To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Unipolar Versus Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures: A Meta-Analysis

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2023

Unipolar Versus Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures: A Meta-Analysis

Vol: 305| Issue: 3| Number:14| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Patients with femoral neck fractures treated by bipolar hemiarthroplasty have superior to unipolar hip function and lower erosion rates and pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol . 2023 Jul;33(5):1449-1462.

Contributing Authors:
K Papavasiliou NK Gkekas D Stamiris I Pantekidis E Tsiridis

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

16 randomized controlled trials (1813 patients) that compared unipolar hemiarthroplasty against bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcomes of interest included the incidence of acetabular erosion, Harris Hip Score (HHS), Normalized Pain Scale (NPS), range of motion (ROM), incidence of mortality, dis...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue