To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Exercise vs. Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy for Degenerative Meniscal Tears: 5 Year Outcomes

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2023

Exercise vs. Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy for Degenerative Meniscal Tears: 5 Year Outcomes

Vol: 303| Issue: 6| Number:35| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Effectiveness of exercise versus arthroscopic partial meniscectomy plus exercise in the management of degenerative meniscal tears at 5-year follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 May;143(5):2609-2620.

Contributing Authors:
R Fernandez-Matias F Garcia-Perez C Gavin-Gonzalez J Martinez-Martin H Valencia-Garcia MT Florez-Garcia

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

4 RCTs with a total of 713 degenerative meniscal tear patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) plus exercise to exercise-based physical therapy alone. The pooled outcomes of interest included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) subscores for pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport-recreation,...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue