To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Differences in tunnel enlargement between cortical button and bioscrew fixation for ACLR

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
April 2019

Differences in tunnel enlargement between cortical button and bioscrew fixation for ACLR

Vol: 8| Issue: 4| Number:9| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Comparison of Tunnel Enlargement and Clinical Outcome Between Bioabsorbable Interference Screws and Cortical Button-Post Fixation in Arthroscopic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Randomized Study With a Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years

Arthroscopy. 2019 Feb;35(2):544-551. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.08.039

Contributing Authors:
HL Ma ER Chiang HT Wu ST Wang CL Liu TH Chen MC Chang KH Chen A Chih-Chang Lin

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

60 patients scheduled for double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were randomized to either bioabsorbable interference screw fixation or cortical button fixation. Primary interest was tunnel enlargement after a minimum of 2 years after surgery. Clinical scores and knee laxity tests were also assessed. Results demonstrated significantly greater enlargement in the anteromedial tunnel...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue