To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Combination therapy improves site-specific BMD vs. teriparatide & denosumab monotherapies

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
January 2017

Combination therapy improves site-specific BMD vs. teriparatide & denosumab monotherapies

Vol: 6| Issue: 1| Number:23| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Response to Therapy With Teriparatide, Denosumab, or Both in Postmenopausal Women in the DATA (Denosumab and Teriparatide Administration) Study Randomized Controlled Trial

J Clin Densitom. 2016 Jul-Sep;19(3):346-51

Contributing Authors:
BZ Leder JN Tsai RM Neer AV Uihlein PM Wallace SA Burnett-Bowie

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

94 postmenopausal osteoporotic women were randomized to receive either 60mg denosumab subcutaneously every 6 months, 20ug teriparatide subcutaneously daily, or a combination treatment of both 60mg denosumab and 20ug teriparatide for a duration of 24 months. The purpose of this study was to compare the individual response rates of the three treatment groups in terms of increases in bone mineral den...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue