To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Clinical measures and knee laxity similar after 24 months between AMP and TT tunnel drilling in ACLR

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
April 2019

Clinical measures and knee laxity similar after 24 months between AMP and TT tunnel drilling in ACLR

Vol: 8| Issue: 4| Number:12| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1

No clinical differences between anteromedial portal and transtibial technique for femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized, controlled trial

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 May;26(5):1335-1342

Contributing Authors:
S McRae J Leiter P MacDonald D Whelan R Khan C Kim

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

96 patients scheduled for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were randomized to femoral tunnel drilling using either the anteromedial portal (AMP) technique or the transtibial (TT) technique. Patients were followed up at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-operation. Results demonstrated no significant differences between the groups at any time point for scores on the ACL-QOL measure, Internationa...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue