To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Comparison for IA corticosteroid versus saline injection following lavage for knee OA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
February 2017

Comparison for IA corticosteroid versus saline injection following lavage for knee OA

Vol: 6| Issue: 2| Number:34| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of arthroscopic lavage versus lavage plus intra-articular corticosteroids in the management of symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Dec;42(12):1477-85

Contributing Authors:
MD Smith M Wetherall T Darby A Esterman J Slavotinek P Roberts-Thomson M Coleman MJ Ahern

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

77 patients with knee osteoarthritis underwent knee arthroscopy & joint lavage, followed by an intra-articular injection of corticosteroid (120mg methylprednisolone acetate) or placebo saline, assigned randomly. The outcomes assessed included patient-reported pain and function, response rate (minimum 30% reduction in pain from baseline), and relapse rate at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24-week follow-ups. Res...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue