To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No significant difference in 10-yr outcomes between ultrashort & conventional stem in THA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
February 2017

No significant difference in 10-yr outcomes between ultrashort & conventional stem in THA

Vol: 6| Issue: 2| Number:44| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Ultrashort versus Conventional Anatomic Cementless Femoral Stems in the Same Patients Younger Than 55 Years

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Sep;474(9):2008-17

Contributing Authors:
YH Kim JW Park JS Kim

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

212 patients scheduled for bilateral simultaneous total hip arthroplasty had their hips randomized to two different femoral stems; one hip was treated using an ultrashort femoral stem, while the other hip was treated with a conventional femoral stem. Patients were followed-up for a mean of 11.8 years. Significant differences that were observed between groups included lower stress-shielding and gre...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue