To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

The mid-term clinical outcome of two graft-tensioning protocols in ACL reconstruction

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
September 2016

The mid-term clinical outcome of two graft-tensioning protocols in ACL reconstruction

Vol: 5| Issue: 9| Number:30| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Effect of Matching or Overconstraining Knee Laxity During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Knee Osteoarthritis and Clinical Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 84-Month Follow-up

Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;44(7):1660-70

Contributing Authors:
MR Akelman PD Fadale MJ Hulstyn RM Shalvoy A Garcia KE Chin J Duryea GJ Badger GA Tung BC Fleming

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

90 patients scheduled to undergo arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction were randomized to either a high tension or low tension protocol for intraoperative graft tensioning. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if the high-tension cohort demonstrated improved clinical outcome measures and a lower incidence of osteoarthritis at 7-year follow-up. The results of this trial ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue