To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Vertical or horizontal suture techniques have similar outcomes in SLAP II lesion repair

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

Vertical or horizontal suture techniques have similar outcomes in SLAP II lesion repair

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:226| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Vertical Versus Horizontal Suture Configuration for the Repair of Isolated Type II SLAP Lesion Through a Single Anterior Portal: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Arthroscopy. 2011 Dec;27(12):1605-13. Epub 2011 Oct 19.

Contributing Authors:
Jose Mar­a Silberberg Joaquín Moya-Angeler Eulogio Martín Manuel Leyes Francisco Forriol

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

32 patients with an arthroscopically diagnosed isolated type II SLAP lesion scheduled for arthroscopic surgical repair using single anterior port were randomized to be fixed with a vertical or horizontal suture configuration. The repair of an isolated type II SLAP lesion through a single anterior portal had improved clinical and functional outcomes for patients, regardless of being done by a verti...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue