To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Patellar tendon vs. hamstring tendon autograft for graft failure rates in anatomic ACLR

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2016

Patellar tendon vs. hamstring tendon autograft for graft failure rates in anatomic ACLR

Vol: 5| Issue: 8| Number:25| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Comparison of Graft Failure Rate Between Autografts Placed via an Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Technique: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression

Am J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):1069-79

Contributing Authors:
CM Gabler CA Jacobs JS Howard CG Mattacola DL Johnson

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

28 studies were included in this analysis with 6 studies reporting patellar tendon autografts and 26 studies reporting hamstring tendon autografts. The purpose of this systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression was to assess the available literature of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for graft failure rates in anatomic ACL reconstruction. A meta-analysis was conducted...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue