Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
RCT
ACE Report #8886
Ace Report Cover Spine

ISASS 2016: Mini-invasive SI joint fusion vs nonsurgical treatment of SI joint dysfunction


Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

Contributing Authors: W Polly D Cher K Wine P Whang C Frank H Lockstadt C Harvey J Sembrano

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS

This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.

Synopsis

148 patients diagnosed with sacroiliac joint dysfunction were randomized to either undergo minimally invasive (MIS) sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion, or to nonoperative treatment. The study was conducted in order to evaluate if minimally invasive operative management offered a significant benefit regarding clinical outcome when compared to nonoperative treatment. A greater success rate was reported in...

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

No credit card required

JOIN Forgot Password?

Not sure if you want to join OrthoEvidence?

Access this report without an Account.

Success, an email containing a link to access this report has been sent to your inbox.

CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.

LEARN MORE

Please Login or Join to leave comments.