To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

The use of OP-1 (BMP-7) is not recommended for instrumented single-level lumbar fusion

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
May 2016

The use of OP-1 (BMP-7) is not recommended for instrumented single-level lumbar fusion

Vol: 5| Issue: 5| Number:69| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

OP-1 Compared with Iliac Crest Autograft in Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion: A Randomized, Multicenter Non-Inferiority Trial

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Mar 16;98(6):441-8

Contributing Authors:
D Delawi W Jacobs JL van Susante L Rillardon D Prestamburgo N Specchia E Gay N Verschoor C Garcia-Fernandez E Guerado H Quarles van Ufford MC Kruyt WJ Dhert FC Oner

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

119 patients scheduled for instrumented single-level posterolateral lumbar fusion were randomized to a graft source of either osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1; Stryker) or autologous iliac crest bone (ICBG). The purpose of this study was to evaluate if OP-1 was non-inferior to ICBG based on an overall success endpoint which was defined as successful fusion, a relative improvement on the Oswestry Disabil...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue