LOGIN
No benefit of external vs internal rotation for immobilization after shoulder dislocation
May 2016
No benefit of external vs internal rotation for immobilization after shoulder dislocation
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Immobilization in External Rotation Versus Internal Rotation After Primary Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):521-32Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which investigated the use of immobilization in external rotation versus internal rotation after primary anterior shoulder dislocation were selected for the current meta-analysis. Pooled comparisons were conducted for outcomes of recurrence, disease-specific quality of life, and compliance. Overall, there was no significant difference between external rotati...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.