To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No functional or clinical difference between MIS and standard TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2013

No functional or clinical difference between MIS and standard TKA

Vol: 2| Issue: 2| Number:170| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A prospective randomized study of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional surgery

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jul 7;92(7):1584-90

Contributing Authors:
N Wulker JP Lambermont L Sacchetti JG Lazaro J Nardi

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

134 patients with symptomatic knee OA, scheduled for total knee arthroplasty, were randomized to the use of either minimally invasive instruments or a standard approach for the TKA procedure. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical outcomes of these two techniques. At 1 year, the minimally invasive surgical technique was not found to provide any substantial benefit, in terms of radiograph...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue