Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Volume:5 Issue:5 Number:5 ISSN#:2563-5476
RCT
ACE Report #8522
Ace Report Cover Arthroplasty

Patient-specific instrumentation provides no benefit in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty


How to Cite

OrthoEvidence. Patient-specific instrumentation provides no benefit in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. ACE Report. 2016;5(5):5. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/8522

Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1

The John Insall Award: No Functional Benefit After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Performed With Patient-specific Instrumentation: A Randomized Trial

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jan;474(1):60-8

Contributing Authors: M Ollivier S Parratte A Lunebourg E Viehweger JN Argenson

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

60 patients undergoing primary medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty were randomized to undergo surgery either with the use of patient-specific instrumentation or conventional instrumentation. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine if patient-specific instrumentation benefited surgical outcomes, including implant positioning, functional outcomes, and 3-dimensional gai...

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

No credit card required

JOIN Forgot Password?

Not sure if you want to join OrthoEvidence?

Access this report without an Account.

Success, an email containing a link to access this report has been sent to your inbox.

CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.

LEARN MORE
For Reprints and Permissions, click here

Please Login or Join to leave comments.