To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

K-wires cost-saving compared to volar locking plates in distal radius fracture treatment

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
November 2015

K-wires cost-saving compared to volar locking plates in distal radius fracture treatment

Vol: 4| Issue: 11| Number:35| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Economic Analysis
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Cost effectiveness of treatment with percutaneous Kirschner wires versus volar locking plate for adult patients with a dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius: analysis from the DRAFFT trial

Bone Joint J. 2015 Aug;97-B(8):1082-9.

Contributing Authors:
S Tubeuf G Yu J Achten NR Parsons A Rangan SE Lamb ML Costa

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

461 patients with a dorsally displaced distal radius fracture were randomized to receive either a volar locking plate or Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare health system and societal costs associated with each method relative to efficacy [measured via quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)], in order to assess cost-effectiveness. Results indicated that there wa...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue