To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Tenodesis vs. tenotomy of the long head of the biceps with concurrent rotator cuff repair

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2015

Tenodesis vs. tenotomy of the long head of the biceps with concurrent rotator cuff repair

Vol: 4| Issue: 10| Number:48| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:3
Journal Level of Evidence:4

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing Clinical Outcomes After Concurrent Rotator Cuff Repair and Long Head Biceps Tenodesis or Tenotomy

Sports Health. 2015 Jul;7(4):303-7

Contributing Authors:
T Leroux J Chahal D Wasserstein NN Verma AA Romeo

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Twelve studies investigating outcome following concurrent rotator cuff repair (RCR) and the long head of the biceps (LHB) tenotomy or tenodesis were included in this meta-analysis and systematic review. Three comparative studies were available for meta-analysis. Pooled analyses of comparative studies demonstrated significantly higher postoperative Constant scores following tenodesis versus tenotom...

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.