To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Norepinephrine useful in reducing hypotension & bradycardic events in rotator cuff repair

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
July 2016

Norepinephrine useful in reducing hypotension & bradycardic events in rotator cuff repair

Vol: 5| Issue: 7| Number:59| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

The effect of norepinephrine versus epinephrine in irrigation fluid on the incidence of hypotensive/bradycardic events during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with interscalene block in the sitting position

Arthroscopy. 2015 May;31(5):800-6

Contributing Authors:
A Chierichini L Frassanito A Vergari S Santoprete F Chiarotti MF Saccomanno G Milano

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

One hundred and nineteen patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomly assigned to a norepinephrine (0.66 mg/L) group or an epinephrine (0.33 mg/L) group to evaluate the efficacy of each treatment. The findings showed that the occurrence rate of hypotensive and bradycardic events (HBEs) was significantly greater in the epinephrine group, but no significant differences were see...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue