To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Epidural steroid injection versus gabapentin for relief from lumbosacral radicular pain

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
June 2015

Epidural steroid injection versus gabapentin for relief from lumbosacral radicular pain

Vol: 4| Issue: 6| Number:11| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Epidural steroid injections compared with gabapentin for lumbosacral radicular pain: multicenter randomized double blind comparative efficacy study

BMJ. 2015 Apr 16;350:h1748

Contributing Authors:
SP Cohen S Hanling MC Bicket RL White E Veizi C Kurihara Z Zhao S Hayek KB Guthmiller SR Griffith V Gordin MA White Y Vorobeychik PF Pasquina

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

145 patients with lumbosacral radicular pain secondary to a herniated disc or spinal stenosis for less than 4 years where randomized to receive either epidural steroid injection plus placebo pills or sham injection plus gabapentin. Average leg pain was assessed over 3 months to evaluate whether an epidural steroid injection or gabapentin is a better treatment for lumbroscral radicular pain. Both t...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.

Continue