To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Open vs arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
September 2015

Open vs arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation

Vol: 4| Issue: 9| Number:1| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta analysis
OE Level Evidence:3
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Effectiveness and safety of arthroscopic versus open Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation: a meta-analysis of clinical trial data

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Apr;135(4):529-38.

Contributing Authors:
L Chen Z Xu J Peng F Xing H. Wang Z Xiang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

16 studies (3 RCTs, 1 quasi-RCT, and 12 controlled clinical trials) were included in this meta-analysis which compared the efficacy and safety of open versus arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations. Range of motion, incidence of recurrence, reoperation, and complications were among the outcomes assessed. Although results indicated similar rates of complications bet...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.

Continue