Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Volume:4 Issue:2 Number:21 ISSN#:2563-5476
ACE Report #7431
Ace Report Cover Arthroplasty

Improved accuracy, but no clinical benefit of robot-assisted vs. conventional TKA

How to Cite

OrthoEvidence. Improved accuracy, but no clinical benefit of robot-assisted vs. conventional TKA. ACE Report. 2015;4(2):21. Available from: https://myorthoevidene.com/AceReport/Report/7431

Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Accurately Restores the Joint Line and Mechanical Axis. A Prospective Randomised Study

J Arthroplasty. 2014 Dec;29(12):2373-7

Contributing Authors: MH Liow MK Xia Z1 Wong KJ Tay SJ Yeo PL Chin

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here


60 patients with knee osteoarthritis and undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were randomized to one of two groups: robot-assisted or conventional TKA. The study aimed to determine whether there was a significant difference in terms of coronal plane mechanical axis alignment outliers, restoration of joint line, clinical outcome measures, length of stay, operative time, and complication...

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

No credit card required

JOIN Forgot Password?

Not sure if you want to join OrthoEvidence?

Access this report without an Account.

Success, an email containing a link to access this report has been sent to your inbox.

CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.