To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No benefit of angular stable locking for intramedullary nailing of distal tibial fractures

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
February 2015

No benefit of angular stable locking for intramedullary nailing of distal tibial fractures

Vol: 4| Issue: 2| Number:4| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Evaluation of the effectiveness of the angular stable locking system in patients with distal tibial fractures treated with intramedullary nailing: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Nov 19;96(22):1889-97.

Contributing Authors:
D Höntzsch KD Schaser GO Hofmann T Pohlemann ES Hem E Rothenbach C Krettek R Attal

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

142 patients who suffered a distal tibial fracture were randomized to undergo intramedullary nailing locked with an angular stable locking system or conventional locking screws. The intent of this study was to determine which locking method achieved earlier full weight-bearing with minimum pain. Follow-up was performed up to 12 months postoperatively. No clinically important differences were obser...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue