To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Uni- versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in eldery patients with femoral neck fractures

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2014

Uni- versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in eldery patients with femoral neck fractures

Vol: 3| Issue: 12| Number:3| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Uni- and bipolar hemiarthroplasty with a modern cemented femoral component provides elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures with equal functional outcome and survivorship at medium-term follow-up

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Sep;134(9):1251-9.

Contributing Authors:
K Kanto R Sihvonen A Eskelinen M Laitinen

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

175 elderly patients with displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures were randomly assigned to undergo unipolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasty (HA). The purpose of this study was to compare implant survival, ambulatory ability, and mortality rates between groups up to 5 years post-surgery. Unipolar HA resulted in a significantly higher dislocation rate compared to bipolar HA, however no significa...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue