To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Similar efficacy of radial & focused shockwave therapy for treating patellar tendinopathy

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
November 2014

Similar efficacy of radial & focused shockwave therapy for treating patellar tendinopathy

Vol: 3| Issue: 11| Number:75| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:2

No difference in effectiveness between focused and radial shockwave therapy for treating patellar tendinopathy: a randomized controlled trial

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Sep;22(9):2026-32. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2522-z. Epub 2013 May 12.

Contributing Authors:
H van der Worp J Zwerver M Hamstra I van den Akker-Scheek RL Diercks

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

43 patients (57 tendons) with patellar tendinopathy were randomly allocated to undergo 3 sessions of radial or focused shockwave therapy, with the purpose of comparing the efficacy of the two shockwave treatments. Both therapies improved Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella (VISA-P) questionnaire scores and pain scores up to 14 weeks post-treatment, but no significant between-group diff...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue