
Posterior stabilized versus cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty at 2years

Posterior stabilized versus cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty at 2years
A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Posterior Stabilized Versus Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Report With Minimum 2-Year Results
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep;29(9 Suppl):179-81.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
111 patients eligible for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were randomly allocated to receive either a posterior stablized (PS) post/cam tibial insert or a more congruent cruciate-substituting (CS) insert. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes during the postoperative period and radiographic and functional outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up between the two devices. At 2-years ...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.