Posterior stabilized versus cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty at 2years
A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Posterior Stabilized Versus Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Report With Minimum 2-Year ResultsJ Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep;29(9 Suppl):179-81.
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
111 patients eligible for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were randomly allocated to receive either a posterior stablized (PS) post/cam tibial insert or a more congruent cruciate-substituting (CS) insert. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes during the postoperative period and radiographic and functional outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up between the two devices. At 2-years ...
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.Continue