To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Rotator Cuff Repair: Double-row versus single-row appproach

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
February 2015

Rotator Cuff Repair: Double-row versus single-row appproach

Vol: 4| Issue: 2| Number:12| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Systematic review
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Is Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Clinically Superior to Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses

Arthroscopy. 2014 Sep;30(9):1156-1165.

Contributing Authors:
R Mascarenhas PN Chalmers ET Sayegh M Bhandari NN Verma BJ Cole AA Romeo

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

This systematic review examined 8 meta-analyses (4 including Level I evidence and 4 including both Level I and Level II evidence) to determine whether double-row (DR) or single-row (SR) rotator cuff repair (RCR) resulted in superior clinical and structural healing outcomes. The findings of this systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses revealed that the double-row approach results in higher r...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue