LOGIN
No difference between cemented and hybrid component fixation in Rotaglide TKA
November 2014
No difference between cemented and hybrid component fixation in Rotaglide TKA
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:2
The Rotaglide mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: no difference between cemented and hybrid implantation
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Aug;22(8):1843-8Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
100 patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis were randomized to undergo total knee arthroplasty with either cemented or hybrid fixation (cementless femoral fixation/cemented tibia component). The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal fixation method of Rotaglide mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty with respect to survival and revision rates, clinical, and radiological outcomes. ...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.