Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
ACE Report #6507
Ace Report Cover Spine

TLIF suggested to be not cost-effective compared to intrumented PLF in cLBP

Study Type:Economic Analysis
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion vs. posterolateral instrumented fusion: cost-utility evaluation along side an RCT with a 2-year follow-up

Eur Spine J. 2014 May;23(5):1137-43. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3238-6. Epub 2014 Feb 21

Contributing Authors: A Christensen K Hoy C Bunger P Helmig ES Hansen T Andersen R Sogaard

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here


100 patients with chronic low back pain were randomized to undergo either transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterolateral fusion (PLF). The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the cost-utility and cost-efficacy of TLIF relative to PLF. Data on primary health care costs, secondary health care costs, and production loss costs over the first 2 postoperative years were used fo...

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

No credit card required

JOIN Forgot Password?

Not sure if you want to join OrthoEvidence?

Access this report without an Account.

Success, an email containing a link to access this report has been sent to your inbox.

CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.


Please Login or Join to leave comments.