Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Volume:3 Issue:4 Number:50 ISSN#:2563-5476
Meta-analysis
ACE Report #6013
Ace Report Cover Spine

Lumbar spondylolisthesis: Low/moderate-quality evidence suggests PLIF is superior to PLF


How to Cite

OrthoEvidence. Lumbar spondylolisthesis: Low/moderate-quality evidence suggests PLIF is superior to PLF. ACE Report. 2014;3(4):50. Available from: https://myorthoevidene.com/AceReport/Report/6013

Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:3
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A systematic review with meta-analysis of posterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in lumbar spondylolisthesis

Eur Spine J. 2014 Jan;23(1):43-56. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2880-8. Epub 2013 Jun 30.

Contributing Authors: X Liu Y Wang G Qiu X Weng B Yu

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

This systematic review/ meta-analysis was comprised of four RCTs and five comparative observational studies (520 patients), and was conducted to compare the efficacy of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) versus posterolateral fusion (PLF) for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Low-/moderate-quality evidence suggested favourable outcomes with PLIF compared to PLF in terms of clinical ...

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

No credit card required

JOIN Forgot Password?

Not sure if you want to join OrthoEvidence?

Access this report without an Account.

Success, an email containing a link to access this report has been sent to your inbox.

CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.

LEARN MORE

Please Login or Join to leave comments.