
Lumbar spondylolisthesis: Low/moderate-quality evidence suggests PLIF is superior to PLF
How to Cite
OrthoEvidence. Lumbar spondylolisthesis: Low/moderate-quality evidence suggests PLIF is superior to PLF. ACE Report. 2014;3(4):50. Available from: https://myorthoevidene.com/AceReport/Report/6013
A systematic review with meta-analysis of posterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in lumbar spondylolisthesis
Eur Spine J. 2014 Jan;23(1):43-56. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2880-8. Epub 2013 Jun 30.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
This systematic review/ meta-analysis was comprised of four RCTs and five comparative observational studies (520 patients), and was conducted to compare the efficacy of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) versus posterolateral fusion (PLF) for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Low-/moderate-quality evidence suggested favourable outcomes with PLIF compared to PLF in terms of clinical ...
To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today
No credit card required
JOIN LOGIN Forgot Password?Not sure if you want to join OrthoEvidence?
Access this report without an Account.Success, an email containing a link to access this report has been sent to your inbox.
Explore some of our unlocked reports below!

Continuing Medical Education Credits
You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.
LEARN MORE
Please Login or Join to leave comments.