To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Mini-midvastus approach displays limited benefit over medial parapatellar approach in TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
November 2014

Mini-midvastus approach displays limited benefit over medial parapatellar approach in TKA

Vol: 3| Issue: 11| Number:52| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Mini-Midvastus vs Standard Medial Parapatellar Approach: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study in Patients Undergoing Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep;25(6 Suppl):5-11, 11.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 Jun 11.

Contributing Authors:
BJ Nestor CE Toulson SI Backus SL Lyman KL Foote RE Windsor

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

27 patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty (54 knees) were collectively enrolled in this study. Each patient was randomly selected to receive a mini-midvastus procedure on one knee, and a standard medial parapatellar procedure on the other. The results confirmed there were no significant differences in outcome between the mini-midvastus and standard approach based on stride length, ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue