To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

High flexion vs. conventional prostheses in TKA: similar migration and clinical outcomes

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
January 2014

High flexion vs. conventional prostheses in TKA: similar migration and clinical outcomes

Vol: 3| Issue: 1| Number:43| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Fixation of High-Flexion Total Knee Prostheses: Five-Year Follow-up Results of a Four-Arm Randomized Controlled Clinical and Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis Study

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Oct 2;95(19):e1411-11

Contributing Authors:
MJ Nieuwenhuijse P van der Voort BL Kaptein HM van der Linden-van der Zwaag ER Valstar RG Nelissen

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

74 patients, scheduled to undergo primary total knee arthroplasty, were randomly assigned into 1 of 4 prosthetic groups: high-flexion mobile bearing, high-flexion fixed bearing, conventional fixed bearing, and conventional mobile bearing. The purpose was to compare the migration and clinical outcomes of high-flexion total knee arthroplasty with fixed or mobile bearings versus the conventional coun...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue