To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Short wait times for TKR mean higher initial cost of medication and lower quality of life

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
September 2014

Short wait times for TKR mean higher initial cost of medication and lower quality of life

Vol: 3| Issue: 9| Number:51| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Is longer waiting time for total knee replacement associated with health outcomes and medication costs? Randomized clinical trial

Value Health. 2010 Dec;13(8):998-1004. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00779.x. Epub 2010 Sep 3.

Contributing Authors:
U Tuominen H Sintonen J Hirvonen S Seitsalo P Paavolainen M Lehto K Hietaniemi M Blom

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

438 patients that required total knee replacement (TKR) were randomized to a short waiting time for surgery (SWT <=3 months) or a nonfixed waiting time (NFWT >3 months) to determine the impact of waiting time on knee pain and physical function, health-reported quality of life (HRQoL), and cost of disease specific medication (DSM). The results after 12 months and subsequent follow-ups suggested tha...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue