To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Meta-analysis: Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized in TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
May 2013

Meta-analysis: Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized in TKA

Vol: 2| Issue: 4| Number:191| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta analysis
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

J Arthroplasty. 2013 Mar;28(3):439-44. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.08.008

Contributing Authors:
MJ Bercik A Joshi J Parvizi

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

12 papers (1114 patients (1265 knees)) were selected for inclusion in this meta-analysis to compare posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized prostheses in TKA, assessing range of motion, flexion, and complication rates. Data demonstrated better flexion and range of motion in posterior-stabilized prosthesis, but no difference in complication rates. The clinical significance of the diff...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue