To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Microwave diathermy demonstrated to improve symptomatic knee OA compared to sham treatment

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
March 2014

Microwave diathermy demonstrated to improve symptomatic knee OA compared to sham treatment

Vol: 3| Issue: 3| Number:13| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Localized hyperthermia induced by microwave diathermy in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Jun;19(6):980-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1350-7. Epub 2010 Dec 15

Contributing Authors:
A Giombini A Di Cesare M Di Cesare M Ripani N Maffulli

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

63 patients were randomized to determine the effectiveness of hyperthermia induced by microwave diathermy in treating sufferers of knee osteoarthritis. Patients were allocated to receive 30-minute sessions of either microwave diathermy at a frequency of 433.92 MHz or sham treatment three times per week for four weeks. Follow-up evaluation was conducted at the end of the therapy phase (4 weeks), an...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue