To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Rotator cuff: Repair associated with better outcome compared to isolated acromioplasty

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
November 2013

Rotator cuff: Repair associated with better outcome compared to isolated acromioplasty

Vol: 2| Issue: 10| Number:44| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tear in the over-60s: repair is preferable to isolated acromioplasty-tenotomy in the short term

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Oct;97(6 Suppl):S125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.06.006. Epub 2011 Jul 27

Contributing Authors:
C Dezaly F Sirveaux R Philippe F Wein-Remy J Sedaghatian O Roche D Mole

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

142 patients over the age of 60 were randomized to determine the impact of rotator cuff repair with acromioplasty and biceps long-head tenotomy in surgical treatment of rotator cuff tears compared to acromioplasty and biceps tenotomy alone. Follow-up of clinical results (Constant score) was conducted for 1 year postoperatively. Tendon healing was also evaluated with ultrasound in patient who under...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue