To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

1 year results of an open wedge vs closed wedge high tibial osteotomy

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2013

1 year results of an open wedge vs closed wedge high tibial osteotomy

Vol: 2| Issue: 2| Number:215| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Correction accuracy and collateral laxity in open versus closed wedge high tibial osteotomy. A one-year randomised controlled study

Int Orthop. 2010 Feb;34(2):201-7. Epub 2009 Aug 27

Contributing Authors:
RD Gaasbeek L Nicolaas WJ Rijnberg CJ van Loon A van Kampen

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

50 active patients, between 18 and 70 years of age, with medial symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee scheduled for high tibial osteotomy were randomized to the procedure by either a closed or open wedge method. At 1 year follow up, both open wedge osteotomy (OWO) and closed wedge osteotomy (CWO) led to accurate and sustained corrections; however, the OWO was superior in correcting the media...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue