To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No difference between high- and low-dose corticosteroid injection for shoulder pain

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
July 2013

No difference between high- and low-dose corticosteroid injection for shoulder pain

Vol: 2| Issue: 6| Number:120| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Comparison of high- and low-dose corticosteroid in subacromial injection for periarticular shoulder disorder: a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Dec;92(12):1951-60. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.033. Epub 2011 Oct 25

Contributing Authors:
JY Hong SH Yoon J Moon do KS Kwack B Joen HY Lee

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

90 patients were randomized to evaluate whether subacromial injection with high-dose corticosteroid in patients with periarticular shoulder disorders was better than low-dose corticosteroid or placebo in improving pain and function. Patients received ultrasound-guided subacromial injection with triamcinolone acetonide (40 or 20 mg) or placebo and were assessed after 8 weeks. Results revealed that ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue