To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Fixed and mobile bearing prostheses show no difference in outcomes at 10 year follow-up

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
July 2013

Fixed and mobile bearing prostheses show no difference in outcomes at 10 year follow-up

Vol: 2| Issue: 6| Number:118| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Long-term comparison of mobile-bearing vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty

J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec;26(8):1219-23. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.01.014. Epub 2011 Mar 11

Contributing Authors:
ST Woolson NJ Epstein JI Huddleston

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Based on a previous study, this paper aimed to report the long term outcomes between mobile and fixed bearing designs for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). 89 patients (107 knees) were randomized to one of the different prostheses at the start of the study, and 50 patients (63 knees) were available at the 10-year follow-up. There were no differences between both groups at the follow-up regarding the ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue