To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No clinical significance between transportal & outside-in technique in ACL reconstruction

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

No clinical significance between transportal & outside-in technique in ACL reconstruction

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:311| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Femoral Graft Bending Angle and Femoral Tunnel Geometry of Transportal and Outside-In Techniques in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An In Vivo 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis

Arthroscopy. 2012 Nov;28(11):1682-94. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.05.884.

Contributing Authors:
Jae Gyoon Kim Joon Ho Wang Hong Chul Lim Jin Hwan Ahn

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

39 patients undergoing anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were randomized to two different femoral tunnel drilling techniques; the transportal technique or the outside-in technique. The results of the study have indicated that the outside-in technique results in more acute femoral graft bending angles and longer mean anteromedial femoral tunnel lengths, but it has yet...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue