To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

TKA: Wound infiltration with DepoFoam bupivacaine is an effective postoperative analgesia

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
June 2013

TKA: Wound infiltration with DepoFoam bupivacaine is an effective postoperative analgesia

Vol: 2| Issue: 5| Number:17| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study comparing wound infiltration of DepoFoam bupivacaine, an extended-release liposomal bupivacaine, to bupivacaine HCl for postsurgical analgesia in total knee arthroplasty

Knee. 2012 Oct;19(5):530-6. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Jan 28

Contributing Authors:
K Bramlett E Onel ER Viscusi K Jones

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

144 patients who were undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were randomized to receive wound infiltration with DepoFoam bupivacaine (133 mg, 266 mg, 399 mg or 532 mg) or bupivacaine HCl with epinephrine. Over 5 days, the DepoFoam bupivacaine groups had significantly lower pain scores at rest than the bupivacaine HCl group at several time periods. On day 5, the cumulative pain...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue