To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No difference between patellar resurfacing and non-resurfacing during TKR

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

No difference between patellar resurfacing and non-resurfacing during TKR

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:507| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: a ten-year randomised prospective trial

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Jun;88(6):734-9

Contributing Authors:
DG Campbell WW Duncan M Ashworth A Mintz J Stirling L Wakefield TM Stevenson

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

58 patients with degenerative osteoarthritis undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) were included in a study exploring whether or not resurfacing of the patella leads to optimal results. Patients were randomized to undergo TKR with or without a cemented polyethylene patellar component. At 10 years, there was no significant difference between the two groups with regards to pain, functioning and pr...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue